Thursday, April 24, 2014

Last Text Response Blog: Social Lubricant



Social Lubricant: How a Marketing Campaign Became the Catalyst for a Societal Debate
Rob Walker, experienced author, wrote an article about how the voice of a commercial had more hit points than a political or news organization.  He catches the attention of the audience with the title “Fat or Fabulous?” which was already used for a magazine article to grab attention.  He roughly and briefly transitions into how and when the campaign started, where it was headed, and where the campaign ended up. He conveys that he believes women were ready to find the voice that says “Stop telling me how to live.” The fact that a huge marketing corporation started it means that it permeates everywhere and is seen by everyone. He admits that Unilever, the company that owns Dove, will not disclose how the campaign affected their sales. Also, he suggests that Dove girls do campaigns for other companies. He closes the article with the conclusion that although Dove’s surveys showed that happiness and kindness was the top attributes that make a woman beautiful that was not the message they could convey to sell their product.

After reading this article, I had a couple questions that I needed answered.
·         First, I needed to know how successful the campaign was with regards to sales.
o   This link discusses more about how successful the campaign itself was not necessarily how much money it generated.
·         Second, I needed to know how successful it was in boosting women’s self-esteem.

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Free Choice Lab-Grown Vaginal Implants



James Gallagher, a health and science reporter for the BBC News wrote an informative article about four girls who received lab-grown vaginas. These four girls were born with vaginal aplasia which he explains as the vagina not forming properly while in the mother’s womb.

Basically the pelvis was scanned to make measurements for a good fit and a biopsy of the vaginal wall to grow a vagina that will have the same tissue. Normal levels of vaginal function were reported. Two of the girls had the vagina connected to the uterus and in theory are capable of becoming pregnant. The lab-grown vaginas were implanted eight years ago while they were in their teens.

There was not very much scientific reasoning in the article so it leads me to believe the reason he wrote the article is not for a scientist’s benefit. News companies are a great middle ground between people with little scientific knowledge and the recent hard to understand scientific advancements.

The article closed focusing on the future benefits of being able to grow cells. It explained approximately how far away commercial use is from clinical trials. The benefits would be used for aesthetic and practical medical purposes. At the bottom of the article there are links to related issues if you are interested in finding out more about growing tissues.

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

What's Up Doc? A Bloody Outrage , That's What Pg. 295

Katherine Ellison, Pulitzer Prize winner, foreign correspondent for Knight-Ridder Newspapers, author of nonfiction books responds to violent internet cartoons in 2005 in The Washington Times.

She makes valid arguments against cartoon violence regarding her daughters. Her children had accessed the internet to watch commercials about Happy Tree Friends. The cartoon began as a cheery tune but quickly progressed into a vicious snap of a tree's neck, which allerted Ms, Ellison of the nature of the content.

Some would regard the cartoon commercial to a Tom & Jerry episode but it has no correlation. Tom & Jerry was humorous while never harming each other enough to cause death.  Ellison is making her audience aware of the transcendence of information. Even though the happily violent commercial is not readily available to young children, it transcends to younger siblings. The younger sibling then laughed at the content beliving it to be funny when a tree had it's head snapped.

Ellison suggests that more internet supervision and that violent commercials never come into children sites.  I agree with Ellison in that websites should be monitored to approve videos by age. There are plenty of parent supervisions that are not implemented. Of course, it is easy to argue that children are smart enough to bypass parental restrictions, but the larger goal in mind is to protect them from learning violence and other graphic media are normal and comedic.


Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Free Choice "Obama Touts High Healthcare Enrollment After Deadline"



This past Monday March 31st was the deadline to sign up for healthcare in order to avoid fines towards next year’s taxes. It is quite interesting to see that the amount of people signed up for healthcare that previously had none exceeded the amount they estimated would sign up.
As with every new law there are a few kinks to be worked out. It was reported that there will be more time given to people that reported technical difficulties signing up for health insurance. Another kind of kink was that people who previously had health insurance were aggravated with changes to their plans whether it was price increases or plan cancellations.
Future efforts are being made to make enrolling an easier effort and to enroll more young Americans which are understood to make the new law a success.
This article was informative and avoided biased language.  It stated many opinions towards “Obamacare” then informed the audience of the statistical information. With this information implementations could be made that the new healthcare plan is a great step towards making sure everyone belonging to this government is taken care of.
Community is something I feel needs to be addressed by the government. The feeling of belonging and caring for one’s neighbor has been lost in the race to the top to be the richest or most famous person of all time. I will never pretend to know much about politics, but I do agree with President Obama that ‘Change is hard. Fixing what is broken is hard.’

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Pages 365-367 Is Health Care a Right?



“Is Health Care a Right?”
This article was published in October 2008 on THCB (The Health Care Blog).The author, Maggie Mahar, has experience writing about health care among other topics. Mahar attempts to define what people think “right” to health care means, the benefits of universal health care, and the effects health care has on Doctors.

Another blogger named Jim II defines rights as limitations on government power not handouts to the poor. It is not a person’s right to receive healthcare. Human rights were defined in the declaration to keep the government from repeating history again and again of infringing on citizens rights. Mahar believes that as an industrial society it is our responsibility to provide equal health care.

Universal health care is beneficial to everyone. Although she does not address the issue of cost all of her supporting reasons are valid. Unhealthy people cannot contribute to society and people who wait longer are worse off and more costly. She also adds in that even people who cannot contribute to the economy can contribute to society.

The argument that Doctors heavily regulated will have deteriorating work ethics in the medical field. Many doctors in the ER are federally regulated to at least stabilize a patient even if they can’t pay. Mahar thinks that Doctors signed up to help patients and should not feel enslaved to do what they so heavily trained for.

After reading this I wanted to know more about the history of health care and the current state of health care. The struggle between healthcare cost and affordability is saddening. There are many medical advances that everyone could benefit from that could never afford them. I strongly agree with Mahar when she references Shadowfax saying “members of a civilized society recognizing that all humans are vulnerable to disease – this is something we have in common – and so willingly pooling their resources to protect each of us against the hazards of fate.” Universal health care is nothing new, we as a society just need to not be afraid of the change.

Here is a link for the history of healthcare from PBS. It is old but all I really wanted was a quick look at how things got started. http://www.pbs.org/healthcarecrisis/history.htm

And finally a link about the 2014 reform.

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Inside the Underground Sex Economy




This article covered many facts that have recently been field researched in major cities like Atlanta, Denver, Seattle and Miami. Pimps, prostitutes, and offenders were interviewed for current information about how much they make, how people become prostitutes, pimps, or "security" and the current style or characteristics of going about their business.  

The range of money each pimp or group made off of prostitution or any form of was very large from almost 33,000 dollars a week to 12,000 a week. Before this research was done it was already known that coercion into prostitution was by knowing friends or family in the business and environmental factors such as being poor or childhood trauma. Now after new research it shows that psychological manipulation plays a major role in coercion. This slides into the realization that the internet is an easy and very accessible new way to recruit workers for the underground sex business.

Questions were also asked about why some involve themselves in this business verses the drug trafficking business. Some said that there was much less worry about getting caught because the internet allows for anonymity and people just aren’t getting arrested for being a pimp.

I believe that this reports how slow law enforcement is behind current legal issues. Young kids are being manipulated into working these underground sex jobs without consequences. The amount of money generated on a weekly basis is outrageous. If young people are going for these types of jobs because there are far fewer arrests in the sex economy than with the drug wars, then law enforcement has acquired some strong tunnel vision. It seems to me that the underground sex economy is flourishing due to the current focus of crime being on drugs and guns. Even though the harm of the sex economy is not immediately noticed by a community it plays a major role in the affluence of gangs which reflects back into crime and drugs.